Why The World Should Rally To Stop Bush Like The Allies Did To Hitler


I don’t know what I should be more angry about - the tyranny of the Neo-Nazi-Con (Neo-Con + Nazi) Bush Regime or the indifference of much of the informed world and the addiction of our youths to hedonistic tree-hugging or explosive angst-inspired art that borders on the suicidal and all its variations thereof.

September 11th was Bush’s reichstag incident. Yes, good people of America, your Nimrod-Pharaoh-Hitler of a President murdered your brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, husbands, wives and children and blamed it on foreign enemies (or paid foreign enemies to do it for him).

Killing, enslaving and lying are wrongful, evil deeds. You don’t need religion to tell you that. But saying that good is evil and evil is good; or proclaiming to the world that a good (or innocent) person is demonic while you yourself are a murderous, lying incarnate of the Devil yet you portray yourself as God’s arm of Justice is outright, downright, absolute evil on the level that even Satan would be humbled.

Bush lied about WMD’s in Iraq - every sane, educated and informed person in the world admits to that. Now he is lying about Iran and Ahmadinejad. Ahmadinejad never said - in Farsi - that Israel should be wiped off the map. Like I said before in an earlier blog post, he said that the Zionist regime occupying Palestine should be removed from the face of history.

Lies, lies, all lies. For example, in this article, 6 Lies You Shouldn’t Believe About Iran, one of the lies mentioned was that Iran is bent on wiping out the Jews. Wrong. Iran is bent on removing the legion of Zionist monsters that terrorise not only Palestine, but the Middle East (including the non-Zionist non-militant Jews wherever they are - even in Iran), the United States and the rest of the world as well. But unlike a certain democracy-installing so-called democracy, Iran has never employed the policy of intervention or offence as the best form of defence. Never. Iranians are some of the most anti-anti-semitic (2 anti’s - would that make a pro-?) people in the Middle East unlike many of their misguided Arab brethren.

In a brief but engaging conversation I had with a newly-acquired friend (he’s from the Baha’i faith, interestingly, you didn’t expect that from a Shi’ah Muslim, did you?) yesterday, there seems to be people who do not understand Iran, Islam or Shi’ah Islam for that matter (not this friend of mine, but someone he knew) to the point that certain potentially harmful misunderstandings might be perpetuated, so let me clarify it here.

With all this attention being paid to Mr Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, he seems to be portrayed on the one side as the reincarnation of Hitler while on the other as a noble, charismatic and courageous leader who is not afraid to stand up for justice and is apparently a humble, religious and pious Shi’ah Muslim, but I am not one who likes to resort to hero worship, especially of people who are still alive (if a person 10 times more benevolent than Gandhi and Mother Theresa combined were to live in my time, I’d still only respect him / her, not worship or defend him / her at all costs from criticism zealously).

Despite whatever it is being said about him or whatever it is that he chooses to show to the public eye, Mr Ahmadinejad would never, ever declare himself to be the ‘Hidden Imam’ that he has been mentioning in the opening prayers that usually precede his speeches or allude to be some messianic figure. That would be a grave mistake akin to apostacy and deserving of excommunication (in the Muslim sense). Unless he is extremely bold beyond limits, or mad, or both, he would never do such a thing, let alone use such a claim as a rallying cry towards the Shi’ah Islamic Annexation of the entire world (a ridiculous notion).

For all of Hitler’s evils, and I can imagine how his Nazi minions worshipped him, from what I know of history, Hitler had never declared himself nor alluded to be the promised Messiah of Judeo-Christian traditions. Ironically, the history of the birth of modern democracy in France has seen its fair share of bloodshed and madmen who, after ridding the country of the ‘evil’ of monarchy, claim themselves to be some atheistic yet godlike figure greater than Christ.

With all this talk about the lies of Bush and his malevolent plans to control the world’s fuel sources and install mind-control microchips into every man, woman and child on the face of the planet, it is easy to get over-emotional (on either side) and demonise innocent people on the other side or on the fence. Place matters in their proper contexts and treat all aspects of all issues with justice (in Arabic, the word ‘justice’ or ‘adl’ means ‘putting things in their proper places’). While I am strongly against letting that criminal Bush go scot-free (either by election or natural death), I am equally strongly against any transgressive or over-the-limits actions, policies, tactics or plans in seeking justice.

Bush and his neo-Nazi-con cronies should be given a better taste of his own medicine. A better taste. He successfully did it to Saddam. Of course, a death sentence would be over the board. That is why I said a ‘better’ taste - a more human and just taste - for dual purposes - (1) to show him how human people can still be in punishing evil and (2) to show the world how human the people he had demonised actually are even in seeking justice against him who had tremendously wronged them. Exile and ostracism would suffice.

, , , , , ,

Comments are closed.